Sent from my iPhone
Reading is thinking. Reading is a process. Comprehension and collaboration are the desired outcomes of this blog. Think Spot is high tech and high touch.
Thursday, February 20, 2014
What Really Motivates Us to Stick to a Project?
Sent from my iPhone
Thursday, February 13, 2014
QEI & SQ3R: What Do We Do With Good Processes?
Fellow Big Historians,
Today is Thursday, February 13, 2014. We have looked extensively at Guns, Germs, and Steel thus far. We have found Jared Diamond's claim/theory in his work. We are beginning to find counter arguments or counter claims in the writings of other people. What do they say about him as a professional and scientist? (Ethos/Authority) What do people think about JD's logic and evidence? (Logos) How do they feel about him? (Pathos).
Monday's blog post laid out our WICR strategy of attacking our learning. It looked something like this:
Writing - Written Conversation (Edmodo Chatroom)
Inquiry - What do you perceive Jared Diamond's claim/theory to be? What point of view is he posing?
Collaboration - Quotation Mingle
Reading - Reading With a Question in mind? SQ3R RI 8 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
I noticed a few mistakes as I read it over again and again. The written conversation you all were involved in was not the TED-Ed written conversation. If we look at Edmodo, we will see many phenomenal posts and some halfway decent responses. I also noticed I was trying WAY TOO HARD to cram too much into the "R"-Reading. Your humble Big History teacher is tremendously proud of the what you all have been using Edmodo, and I will say that lately you have been listening to each other a little better. Let's try to really dig into our Edmodo and TED-Ed discussions by offering insightful, extending, and elaborating responses to each other.
So... Today's learning tactics for attacking our learning are as follows:
WRITING- Written Conversation (TED-Ed Discussion Board)
INQUIRY- Now that we are identifying counter arguments to JD, can we begin to delineate connections between Guns, Germs and Steel and Thresholds 6 & 7?
COLLABORATION- Community Circle
READING- SQRRR (R2- "Recite" will be our focus.)
If you have made it this far in the blog post then you are actually reading it. Thank you. Please wrap up your reading experience by clicking on the following links. Threshold 6 is Collective Learning. Threshold 7 is Agriculture. We will need to keep these in mind as we try to connect BH to GGS. Enjoy, and have fun!!
Yours truly,
C-Dawg
From the cluttered mind of C, Teacher
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Today is Thursday, February 13, 2014. We have looked extensively at Guns, Germs, and Steel thus far. We have found Jared Diamond's claim/theory in his work. We are beginning to find counter arguments or counter claims in the writings of other people. What do they say about him as a professional and scientist? (Ethos/Authority) What do people think about JD's logic and evidence? (Logos) How do they feel about him? (Pathos).
Monday's blog post laid out our WICR strategy of attacking our learning. It looked something like this:
Writing - Written Conversation (Edmodo Chatroom)
Inquiry - What do you perceive Jared Diamond's claim/theory to be? What point of view is he posing?
Collaboration - Quotation Mingle
Reading - Reading With a Question in mind? SQ3R RI 8 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
I noticed a few mistakes as I read it over again and again. The written conversation you all were involved in was not the TED-Ed written conversation. If we look at Edmodo, we will see many phenomenal posts and some halfway decent responses. I also noticed I was trying WAY TOO HARD to cram too much into the "R"-Reading. Your humble Big History teacher is tremendously proud of the what you all have been using Edmodo, and I will say that lately you have been listening to each other a little better. Let's try to really dig into our Edmodo and TED-Ed discussions by offering insightful, extending, and elaborating responses to each other.
So... Today's learning tactics for attacking our learning are as follows:
WRITING- Written Conversation (TED-Ed Discussion Board)
INQUIRY- Now that we are identifying counter arguments to JD, can we begin to delineate connections between Guns, Germs and Steel and Thresholds 6 & 7?
COLLABORATION- Community Circle
READING- SQRRR (R2- "Recite" will be our focus.)
If you have made it this far in the blog post then you are actually reading it. Thank you. Please wrap up your reading experience by clicking on the following links. Threshold 6 is Collective Learning. Threshold 7 is Agriculture. We will need to keep these in mind as we try to connect BH to GGS. Enjoy, and have fun!!
Yours truly,
C-Dawg
From the cluttered mind of C, Teacher
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Processes: WICR, SQ3R, QEI, and 6 Pillars of Big History...
Good Morning Dudes & Dudettes,
Today is Tuesday, February 11, 2014. Look back at the blog post from last week. I started to detail some processes that directly affect us as learners especially in a content-area literacy class like The Big History Project. It is my hope that by the end of the school year you have not only learned some of these processes, but have also OWNED THEM.
If we look at our day from a WICR perspective, here is our agenda:
Writing - Written Conversation (Edmodo Chatroom)
Inquiry - What do you perceive Jared Diamond's claim/theory to be? What point of view is he posing?
Collaboration - Quotation Mingle
Reading - Reading With a Question in mind? SQ3R RI 8 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
If we look at our day from an SQ3R perspective, we will be focusing on the second "R".
S
Q
R
Recite - (Record, React, Respond, RE-READ, Record)
R
And last, but certainly not least, if we look at today from a QEI perspective, we will be focusing on INTERPRETATION.
Question
Evidence
Interpretation
Keep these processes in mind as we move through the morning. They will follow us through the week as well as into our next project: LITTLE BIG HISTORY.
Yours truly,
C-Dawg
From the cluttered mind of C, Teacher
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Today is Tuesday, February 11, 2014. Look back at the blog post from last week. I started to detail some processes that directly affect us as learners especially in a content-area literacy class like The Big History Project. It is my hope that by the end of the school year you have not only learned some of these processes, but have also OWNED THEM.
If we look at our day from a WICR perspective, here is our agenda:
Writing - Written Conversation (Edmodo Chatroom)
Inquiry - What do you perceive Jared Diamond's claim/theory to be? What point of view is he posing?
Collaboration - Quotation Mingle
Reading - Reading With a Question in mind? SQ3R RI 8 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
If we look at our day from an SQ3R perspective, we will be focusing on the second "R".
S
Q
R
Recite - (Record, React, Respond, RE-READ, Record)
R
And last, but certainly not least, if we look at today from a QEI perspective, we will be focusing on INTERPRETATION.
Question
Evidence
Interpretation
Keep these processes in mind as we move through the morning. They will follow us through the week as well as into our next project: LITTLE BIG HISTORY.
Yours truly,
C-Dawg
From the cluttered mind of C, Teacher
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Processes: where we are...
Hey Gang,
Today is Camel Day, February 5, 2014. It probably comes as no surprise to most of you, but by the end of class today your presentations are due. If we reflect on the learning we have done over the past few weeks we can begin to see a process emerge. There are a few ways that we can think of this process. Here are a few of them:
1.)
IMMERSE
INVESTIGATE
COALESCE
GO PUBLIC
2.)
Annotate
Analyze
Articulate
Activism
3.)
QUESTIONS
EVIDENCE
INTERPRETATION
4.)
ANALYSIS
INTERPRETATION
PERSONALIZATION
TAKE ACTION
When we look at these processes and think about the things we do during each step in a process, you can begin to see some connections. Together you can see similarities. Look at where we annotate. Look at where we share our findings. Look at where we build our own interpretations. I leave you with a question in mind...
Where does evidence play a role in each one of these processes?
C... Out
From the cluttered mind of C, Teacher
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Today is Camel Day, February 5, 2014. It probably comes as no surprise to most of you, but by the end of class today your presentations are due. If we reflect on the learning we have done over the past few weeks we can begin to see a process emerge. There are a few ways that we can think of this process. Here are a few of them:
1.)
IMMERSE
INVESTIGATE
COALESCE
GO PUBLIC
2.)
Annotate
Analyze
Articulate
Activism
3.)
QUESTIONS
EVIDENCE
INTERPRETATION
4.)
ANALYSIS
INTERPRETATION
PERSONALIZATION
TAKE ACTION
When we look at these processes and think about the things we do during each step in a process, you can begin to see some connections. Together you can see similarities. Look at where we annotate. Look at where we share our findings. Look at where we build our own interpretations. I leave you with a question in mind...
Where does evidence play a role in each one of these processes?
C... Out
From the cluttered mind of C, Teacher
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Excellent Classroom Poster on How to Cite Information from Internet
Sent from my iPhone
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Worldviews, Values, & Claim Testers: Answering Inquiry Questions
Howdy Cowpokes,
Today is Tuesday, February 4, 2014. You have embarked and are probably in the middle of creating a presentation based off of texts, videos, and images that you collected so far. In the design brief you will find two inquiry questions:
1. How did your culture/time period’s worldview affect their choices and actions?
2. What values, skills and forms of knowledge did people need to succeed?
When we READ WITH A QUESTION IN MIND we use these questions to make our reading meaningful. We look for areas in the texts, videos, and images that would answer these questions. We look for possible actions and choices. We look for values, skills, and forms of knowledge. That said, sometimes the actions and choices we read about give us insight into the worldview of people. They explain why people do what they do.
Worldview, is a comprehensive perspective or philosophy that is made up of people's knowledge and experiences. Perception dictates reality. Therefore, a worldview dictates how people see the world. How people see the world dictates how they act, react, and make choices in it. As you read and try to answer the inquiry questions try to find evidence that points out people's worldview. It's always connected to thought and action.
Lastly, we come to claim testing. Claim testing and the 4 "claim testers" assist us in analyzing information that we may need to IGNORE, TRUST, or INVESTIGATE. From what we have learned so far, Bob Bain has shared 4 ways in which we try to spot "A LIE".
A= Authority
L= Logic
I= Intuition
E= Evidence
Use these in your work and remember them. They will come back as we look at each others' presentations and CLAIMS as the week ends.
Thanks for reading, and as always...
Love, peace, and taco grease,
C-Dawg
From the cluttered minds of C and gang, Teachers
School District of Waukesha
Waukesha STEM Academy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)